Affordable housing non-profits (Piedmont Housing Alliance, Thomas Jefferson Area Coalition for the Homeless, and Virginia Supportive Housing), in collaboration with the current landowner (Tiota, Ltd.), with support from the Charlottesville Area Community Foundation, submitted a rezoning request to redevelop the Red Carpet Inn along Route 29 in the Places 29 South growth area.
With two months already elapsed, 2021 is moving along at a steady pace in terms of local and regional government. The pandemic is not over, but there are signs that we’ve moved into a new phase.
For now, meetings in Albemarle, Charlottesville, and some other localities continue to be held virtually in order to halt community spread. It’s too early for a return to City Council Chambers or Lane Auditorium, so for the next while it’s possible to continue to be in many places at once. If you’ve ever wanted to get involved in local government, take advantage of online meetings while they are still the norm.
And if you do want to get involved, this newsletter is intended to get you to the information you need. For nearly two years now, I’ve written this each week to help you and others keep track of what’s coming up.
I thank those who are supporting this endeavor, and I encourage you to send it on to other people. Thanks as always to the Piedmont Environmental Council for their sponsorship of this newsletter.
Monday, March 1, 2021
Charlottesville City Council meets virtually at 6:30 p.m. and there’s a lot of key items on the agenda after Community Matters and the consent agenda. (meeting info)
First, Council will be asked to endorse the Affordable Housing Plan crafted by Rhodeside & Harwell (RHI) as the first step toward completing the Comprehensive Plan update and a rewrite of the city’s zoning code. A major recommendation in the plan is for the city to spend $10 million a year on affordable housing. (latest draft)
“With $10 million in average annual spending over ten years, Charlottesville could grow its existing stock of subsidized homes by nearly 70 percent, preserve nearly 40 percent of existing subsidized housing at risk of becoming unaffordable or obsolete, and provide direct assistance annually to up to 2,000 households facing housing instability,” reads the staff report.
That $10 million is to be broken down as $7 million in direct subsidies to support below-market housing, $2 million in tax relief, and $1 million in administration. The staff report states that the first five years of direct subsidies are already proposed in the city’s capital improvement program. These are for the Friendship Court redevelopment being undertaken by Piedmont Housing Alliance and renovation and new construction at two city public housing sites.
Next, Council will be asked to endorse the Cherry Avenue Small Area Plan, a document whose creation was guided by the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission while City Manager Chip Boyles was the agency’s executive director. Council held their public hearing on this on January 12 as part of a joint meeting with the Planning Commission. The Fifeville Neighborhood Association has also been heavily involved with its development. (link to draft)
“The plan should serve as a to-do list, helping to determine changes to local land use codes, capital investments, development of recurring programs, and adoption of one-time initiatives,” reads the staff report.
Council is specifically being asked to add the Cherry Avenue document to the city’s Comprehensive Plan. Previous Councils did the same for the Strategic Investment Area and the Hydraulic Small Area Plan.
After that, Council will get an update on the Historic Resources Committee’s review of the city’s Honorary Street Designation program. (staff report)
The final two items relate to the city’s next budget. First, Boyles will present the city’s budget for fiscal year 2022, followed by a presentation of the school budget by Superintendent Rosa Atkins.
Boyles’ first budget totals $190,689,839 and is a 0.26 percent decrease from the existing year’s budget. His budget message accentuates the positive, but acknowledges that the city has spending limits. (budget page)
“This budget continues to provide substantial investment in the services that our residents, businesses and visitors have come to expect from the City of Charlottesville, but still makes some reasonable choices and changes in service levels as we continue to look at efficiencies,” Boyles wrote.
A few quick facts from the budget:
- The capital budget includes nearly $7.5 million in funding for affordable housing initiatives
- Charlottesville saw over $73 million in commercial construction in 2020
- The budget includes funding to hire a Deputy City Manager for Race, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion to oversee Human Rights Commission and Police Civilian Review Board
- Council is being asked to consider seeking state permission for an additional local sales tax to pay for capital projects. This would require a local referendum. (state code 1) (state code 2)
- Only $1 million is recommended for the 7th Street Parking Garage and an additional $7 million programmed for FY23
- No additional funding is recommended for the West Main Streetscape and there is only one of the project.
Superintendent Rosa Atkins is presenting a $94.25 million budget request to Council. This request was approved by the Charlottesville School Board on February 22. Read Katherine Knott’s story in the Daily Progress for more information.
There are three items on Council’s consent agenda.
- Final reading of an amendment to the city’s CDBG grant to become compliant with federal rules on spending money on a timely manner (staff report)
- First reading of approval to appropriate $600,000 in additional funding for adoptive services (staff report)
- First reading of a $180,750 grant from the Virginia Transit Association to provide fares for working families (staff report)
More self-storage coming to Albemarle
There are a lot of projects on the agenda of the Albemarle Architectural Review Board. They begin at 1 p.m in a virtual meeting. (meeting info)
- Charlottesville Albemarle Airport seeks to replace the elevator from the terminal to the long-term parking lot with two new “elevator pavilions.” (staff report)
- An existing office building at the intersection of Hilton Heights Road and U.S. 29 is slated to be demolished to make way for construction of a new 1,138 building to house another Starbucks with a drive-through window. The 5,332 square foot office building was constructed in 1973. (staff report)
- There are some minor amendments to a Holiday Inn Express at the intersection of U.S. 250 and Stony Point Road. The building is currently under construction next to a storage unit and a future WaWa. (staff report)
- The former Goodwill building on U.S. 29 will be converted to an auto body repair shop called Caliber Collision (staff report)
- The Hardee’s in the southwest quadrant of U.S. 29 and Rio Road is becoming an auto dealership and the ARB will review the final site plan (staff report)
- A 105,726 square foot building is to be constructed at Forest Lakes Shopping Center to serve as a self-storage facility. In December, the Board of Supervisors approved a rezoning to allow additional square footage at this location. (staff report)
- The ARB will hold a work session on architectural revisions for the Sheetz proposed for the northwest quadrant of the intersection of U.S. 29 and Airport Road. (staff report)
Tuesday, March 2, 2021
The Albemarle Planning Commission meeting starts at 6 p.m. and it is important to state first what is not on the agenda. A public hearing for a 94 foot cell tower in Greenwood will not proceed because the applicant has requested “infinite deferral.” (meeting info)
The second, though, is sure to be an eventful one. A Virginia Beach company called RST Development is seeking a rezoning of 19.5 acres off of U.S. 29 in the Hollymead area to build a maximum of 370 units split between 259 multifamily units for rental and 108 townhouse units for sale.
That’s a net density of 19.89 units an acre. The Comprehensive Plan designates the land as “urban density residential” which calls for a range between 6 units and 34 units.
The existing zoning is R-1 and without the change the developer would only be permitted to build between 19 and 29 units. The rezoning application includes a condition that 50 percent of the units would be rented to households who make less than 80 percent of the area median income.
“The County’s Principal Planner for Housing has reviewed this section of the plan on affordable housing and has expressed no objections to the proposal or the language used,” reads the staff report.
However, planning staff are not recommending approval at this time, in part because at least one of the proposed buildings would be “inconsistent with the recommendations of the Places29 Master Plan.” There’s also a concern about the number of students the rezoning would add to area schools.
Immediately to the south is the Brookhill mixed-use development which was rezoned to the Neighborhood Model District. To the east is the Forest Lakes neighborhood whose homeowners association is opposing the development.
“Forest Lakes is getting geared up for our involvement in this,” wrote Scott Eliff of the Forest Lakes Community Association in a January 25 email included in the packet. “Strong view that this should be denied – [on] a wide range of grounds, with a lot of supporting analyses. We’ll be prepared when Planning Commission gets scheduled.”
There’s a campaign to oppose the development on the Forest Lakes website, including a 15 minute video in which Elliff talks about what he considers the flaws in the project. Language in a petition claims it would decrease property values and ruin “entryway aesthetics” for the existing neighborhood. The petition also claims there has been “virtually zero involvement of the local community.”
A community meeting for the project was held on July 20, 2020. That meeting can be reviewed on YouTube.
- The Greene County Board of Supervisors will hold a budget work session beginning at 4:30 p.m. (agenda) (budget page)
- The Nelson County Board of Zoning Appeals meets at 7 p.m. in person at the General District Courtroom in Lovingston (agenda packet)
Wednesday, March 3, 2021
The Albemarle Board of Supervisors meets at 1 p.m. today for what appears to be the lightest agendas for a regular meeting in some time. However, two of the items are substantial.
There is a proposal to increase some fees paid by developers to cover the cost of processing land use applications and other permits. A public hearing is scheduled for April 21, 2021 but Supervisors will discuss the current proposal. (staff meeting)
In the evening is a public hearing on the proposed $466 million budget for FY22. You can review the 261-page budget here but I recommend reading Allison Wrabel’s story in the Daily Progress for an overview or my very brief summary. Or watch the video!
Fluvanna community survey
The Fluvanna Board of Supervisors will meet in-person at 4 p.m. but a Zoom link will be available for those who wish to participate. (agenda packet)
Over 500 people responded to a survey of Fluvanna residents conducted last fall. Most respondents rated Fluvanna as an “excellent”, “good”, or “fair” place to learn, live, play, raise children, retire. Nearly twenty percent of respondents rated Fluvanna a “poor” place to run a business. Just over a third responded that the county was a “poor” place to shop. Just over forty-one percent of respondents said Fluvanna is at a “standstill” and 35.5 percent said the county is “moving in the right direction.”
To get a sense of what issues are salient in Fluvanna, you might consider reading through the responses to question 12 – What is the most important issue facing Fluvanna in the next five years? Some highlights:
- “Losing our rural communities and safe roads by allowing dense subdivision builds”
- “We need more lanes on 53 to Cville. Someone needs to control Aqua and lower the water rates. We need more businesses in the county to take the tax burden off of the residents.”
- “We need businesses that employee more than 10 people! And require new houses being built to 10 acre minimum!!”
- “We need a real grocery store that can support the number of households in our community and need a sufficient number of gas pumps for the number of house holds in our county.”
- “People need to realize the lake is so large, that Fluvanna isn’t rural. How much money leaves Fluvanna to go to shop/eat in Louisa, Albemarle, Charlottesville, and Richmond?”
- “Climate change is real. Virginia has finally acknowledged that. People WILL be moving inland. Fluvanna needs to be prepared with goods, services, and roads to accommodate new people.”
- “Racial equality, environmental sustainability, maintaining parks”
Thursday, March 4, 2021
The first meeting of the Thomas Jefferson Planning District Commission without Chip Boyles as director will begin virtually at 7 p.m. with interim director Christine Jacobs taking the helm. (meeting info)
On the agenda:
- A review of what work the Rideshare program will undertake in FY22.
- A review of the Rural Transportation Planning work program, which includes the Zion Crossroads Gateway Plan to assist planning for an area designated by both Fluvanna and Louisa for growth.
- That plan also includes a portion of the Route 29 North Corridor study underway for both Albemarle and Greene between Airport Road and U.S. 33.
- Jacobs will present a “100 day-plan” to commissioners.
- As of February 23, there have been 12,766 individual searches of the Porchlight affordable housing search portal.
In other meetings:
- Charlottesville City Council will hold its first work session on the budget at 4 p.m.
- Albemarle’s Natural Heritage Committee will meet at 5:30 p.m. (agenda)
- Charlottesville’s Bike and Pedestrian Advisory Committee will meet at 5:30 p.m. (meeting info)
Friday, March 5, 2021
At noon, Albemarle County will continue its information series on stream health with a discussion about the local water supply plan with officials from the Rivanna Water and Sewer Authority. (meeting info)
Thanks for reading! I know there’s a lot of information here, but there’s a lot of information out there, too! Drop me a line if you have questions, comments, or have more information.
This post was contributed by Sean Tubbs. Sean is a journalist working to build a new information and news outlet centered around Charlottesville and Virginia. In 2020, he launched a daily newscast and newsletter and also created a semi-regular podcast on the pandemic.
Support for Sean’s “Week Ahead” update comes from The Piedmont Environmental Council.
At this point in the 2021 Virginia General Assembly, the House and Senate versions of the budget have passed their respective chambers and a conference committee has been assigned to work out the differences. While we believe many of our conservation funding priorities are well-positioned, we’re making a final push to help ensure they make it into the final budget.
And that’s where you come in. The budget conferees are on an abbreviated timeline to work out any differences and decisions will be made swiftly. Now is the time for you to show support for funding that Virginia relies on to protect natural resources and farmland, and expand public access.
Though it’s always helpful for people to contact their own delegate/senator, this week the focus is on communicating with the General Assembly members in the budget conference committee. See the list below for contact information.
PEC Budget Priorities
Below is the short list of amendments/asks that PEC is focused on. For a longer list of funding priorities that our partners in the conservation community are working on, scroll down to the bottom of this page.
- SUPPORT senate amendment 385 #1s Historic Properties Catalogue – $250,000
This amendment by Senator McClellan provides $250,000 for the purpose of surveying of historic properties related to untold histories, providing for a more inclusive state database of historic properties.
- SUPPORT full funding for the Farmland Preservation Fund – $2 million
Delegate Gooditis placed an amendment in the house for $2 million. It was included in the house budget at an additional $1 million (but the senate version provides no increase). This program supports local purchase of development rights programs with matching funds.
- SUPPORT full funding of the Virginia Land Conservation Foundation
Full funding of this program would be $16 million according to state code. Though given the need, one could argue for even greater levels. The introduced budget contained $10 million and the house kept that amount. However, the senate budget took $3.5M out and placed a hold on an additional $5M for two specific projects.
Ultimately, whatever the amount determined, we should not encourage the use of those funds for projects picked by the legislature (the $5M). This ignores the purpose of the independent VLCF Board appointed to make those decisions using an established criteria. If it is the will of the committee to fund the projects specified in the senate budget, then it should be accomplished through a specific allocation.
- SUPPORT $40 million for multi-use trails in senate budget (from CARES Act)
This funding was a welcome surprise. While the full amount is already allocated for specific projects, we welcome this infusion. This provision recognizes the importance of trails and shines a spotlight on the need for future funding.
- SUPPORT full funding for Agricultural Best Management Practices (Ag BMPs) – $100 million
While the house budget funded Ag BMPs at a higher level than the senate, the actual needs assessment calls for $100 million per year. This funding is critical if we are to hit the targets called for in the Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) for the Chesapeake Bay.
- SUPPORT $250,000 to study the health and environmental impacts of gold mining
The house budget includes $250,000 to study the health and environmental impacts of the mining of gold, pursuant to House Bill 2213. This effort is essential if we are to ensure regulations adequately protect the public health and environment.
Contact the Budget Conferees
Members of the House/Senate budget conference committee will ultimately decide which amendments/initiatives move forward. Please contact the conferees below to express your support for conservation funding, especially if your own delegate/senator is one of them.
House Budget Conferees
|Del. Luke Torian||52||(703) 785-2224||DelLTorian@house.virginia.gov|
|Del. Mark Sickles||43||(703) 922-6440||DelMSickles@house.virginia.gov|
|Del. Betsy Carr||69||(804) 698-1069||DelBCarr@house.virginia.gov|
|Del. Roslyn Tyler||75||(434) 336-1710||DelRTyler@house.virginia.gov|
|Del. David Bulova||37||(703) 310-6752||DelDBulova@house.virginia.gov|
|Del. Barry Knight||81||(757) 426-6387||DelBKnight@house.virginia.gov|
|Del. Terry Austin||19||(540) 254-1500||DelTAustin@house.virginia.gov|
Senate Budget Conferees
|Sen. Janet Howell||32||(703) firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Sen. George Barker||39||(703) email@example.com|
|Sen. Louise Lucas||18||(757) firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Sen. Mamie Locke||2||(757) email@example.com|
|Sen. Creigh Deeds||25||(434) firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Sen. Tommy Norment||3||(757) email@example.com|
|Sen. Emmett Hanger||24||(540) firstname.lastname@example.org|
|Sen. Dick Saslaw (advisor)||35||(703) email@example.com|
|Sen. Stephen Newman (advisor)||23||(434) firstname.lastname@example.org|
Conservation funding priorities for Virginia’s environmental community
*List pulled together by our partners at the Virginia League for Conservation Voters.
Chesapeake Bay Cleanup
- $100 million per year for the Virginia Agriculture Cost Share program.
- At least $80 million per year for the Stormwater Local Assistance Fund.
- At least $55 million per year to upgrade wastewater facilities.
- $20 million per year for the Virginia Land Conservation Fund.
- Full funding of the Farmland Preservation Fund of $2 million.
- $5 million for multi-use trail development.
- $40 million for a statewide multi-use trail initiative.
- Re-allocation of $12 million for the Department of Environmental Quality.
- Full funding of Governor Northam’s proposed budget for all other natural resources agencies.
Specific Budget Amendments:
- Budget item #307 #1s: $60,000 in FY22 for PFAS (per and polyfluoroalkyl substances) Drinking Water Study.
- Budget item #124 #1h: $250,000 to study the health and environmental impacts of gold mining.
- Budget item #385#1s: $250,000 to expand Virginia’s historical property catalogue to include underrepresented African American and indigenous communities.
- Budget item #125 #1h: $5 million the second year from the general fund for the Electric Vehicle Rebate Fund consistent with the provisions of House Bill 1979.
- Budget item #442 #2h: $500,000 for DRPT to study the Commonwealth’s current public transportation system focusing on the equitable delivery of transportation services and the modernization of transit in the Commonwealth.
- Budget item 442 #3s: provides $5 million in federal funds to the Transit Ridership Incentive Program.
- Budget item 443 #1s: provides $137.6 million from the Coronavirus Response and Relief Act to extend intercity passenger rail service from Roanoke to the Blacksburg-Christiansburg area and increase passenger rail service along the I-81/Route 29 Corridor from Washington, D.C.
- Budget item #376 #1h: “Advanced Recycling Study” directs the Department of Environmental Quality to study Advanced Recycling, and report its findings to the Chairs of the House Agriculture, Chesapeake and Natural Resources and Senate Agriculture, Conservation, and Natural Resources Committees by December 31, 2021.
View even more budget issues/bills that the environmental community is paying attention to this session on the Virginia Conservation Network’s website vcnva.org.
The final week of the second month of 2021 is here, and is slightly less hectic than last week. Or is it? The pandemic seems to have made everything busier than in years before with virtual meetings becoming commonplace and part of how things work in our community.
Today is Presidents’ Day, and what better a time to get this newsletter out to you than on a national holiday! In these times when it may seem powerless to affect what happens in federal government, perhaps this is a good day to learn more about what’s happening locally. That’s where this newsletter comes in each and every week. Thanks for reading and please send it on to someone you think might benefit from the information.
I wanted to give you a brief update on Greene County’s comprehensive plan review process. The planning commission’s initial public hearing was scheduled to take place a few weeks ago on January 20, but since the meeting ran long, they decided to postpone it to allow for better public participation.
The initial comprehensive plan public work session and public hearing has been rescheduled for next Wed., February 17 at 6:30 PM. It is now the first item on the planning commission’s agenda. As I mentioned in my previous email, this is a great opportunity to get an overview of the existing comprehensive plan, as well as to learn about the county’s anticipated timeline for completing the comprehensive plan review this year.